Hunts breed foxes to hunt - MYTH

 

This is another of those myths that the anti-hunters like to put about, knowing that, even though they have no proof, some mud will stick.

Take it from me, hunts do not breed foxes. They don't need to. Foxes do it all by themselves – they’re clever like that.

 

You might have heard of an incident a couple of years ago in Yorkshire, where an anti-hunter claimed to have "discovered" a cage containing fox cubs being bred on Hunt Land. This accusation was so fatuous, that when an investigation was set up to look into this, the anti-hunters did not even bother to submit any evidence.

 

So where does this myth spring from?

The basis usually turns out to be the fact that many Hunts, or hunt supporters have constructed "artificial earths" in their territory

An "Earth" is the technical term for a fox’s burrow, or den, and an artificial earth usually consists of a buried box or chamber with two or more buried pipes leading into it.

The logic usually runs something like this :

The problem with this argument is that the Hunt is not, and never has been, trying to kill all the foxes.

Hunting is about Control of foxes, and control means keeping numbers up when they are too low, just as much as it means reducing numbers when they are too high.

Think about this scenario :

If I were to do any of these things, all of which increase the wildlife and diversity of the wood, people would say that I had done a good thing.

The Government would even, in many instances, pay me Grants for it.

But :

No. I don't think so. Just a little bit of inconsistency there.

Why?

Because everyone knows that we kill foxes.

What they forget is that we kill many other species too and for exactly the same reasons. Conservation means killing.

The only difference is that Fox Hunting is a high profile activity, that people want to have a go at.

The problem, once again, is that these people "cannot see the wood for the trees."